Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program New Rules Reshaping US Food Aid

Published

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program New Rules Reshaping US Food Aid

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) stands at a crossroads as sweeping new rules redefine eligibility, benefits, and state flexibility in 2024, marking the most significant overhaul in over a decade. With inflation eroding household budgets and food insecurity reaching record levels—affecting nearly 1 in 7 Americans—these policy shifts promise to either expand lifelines for vulnerable families or tighten access for those already struggling to afford groceries. The changes, embedded in the 2023 Farm Bill and phased rollouts led by the USDA, reflect a fractured political landscape where economic stimulus clashes with workfare mandates, leaving beneficiaries, advocates, and lawmakers locked in a debate over who truly benefits from the $80 billion annual program.

Behind the headlines, the new SNAP framework introduces stricter asset tests that could disqualify middle-class households, expands work requirements for able-bodied adults, and grants states unprecedented autonomy to tailor programs—from benefit amounts to student eligibility exemptions. Yet critics warn the reforms risk deepening disparities, particularly in rural areas where grocery access is limited and non-citizen families face heightened documentation hurdles. As the USDA prepares to roll out changes state-by-state, the stakes could not be higher: Will these rules bridge gaps in America’s safety net or leave millions further behind in a cost-of-living crisis?

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program New Rules Reshaping US Food Aid

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Overview and Implementation of New Rules

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program New Rules Reshaping US Food Aid

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, stands as one of the most critical social safety nets in the United States. Established in 1939 as part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, SNAP initially aimed to stabilize farm prices during the Great Depression by distributing surplus commodities to low-income Americans. However, it was not until 1964, with the passage of the Food Stamp Act, that the program evolved into its modern form—providing electronic benefits (EBT cards) to eligible individuals and families to purchase nutritious food. Over the decades, SNAP has undergone significant transformations, expanding eligibility, increasing benefit amounts, and adapting to economic crises, including the Great Recession (2008) and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022). Key milestones include the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which introduced work requirements and time limits for able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs), and the 2008 Farm Bill, which expanded benefits and simplified enrollment.

The most recent wave of changes stems from the 2023 Farm Bill (Agriculture Improvement Act of 2023), signed into law by President Joe Biden on December 29, 2023, after months of bipartisan negotiations in Congress. This legislation marked the first major overhaul of SNAP since 2018, addressing long-standing challenges such as food insecurity, inflation-driven cost-of-living increases, and administrative inefficiencies. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), led by Secretary Tom Vilsack, announced the implementation of new rules in January 2024, emphasizing a phased approach to minimize disruption for beneficiaries while aligning the program with contemporary economic realities. The updates reflect a dual focus: strengthening support for vulnerable populations while streamlining operational processes to reduce fraud and improve efficiency. Below is a detailed breakdown of the program’s historical context, legislative evolution, and the structural shifts introduced in 2024.

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program New Rules Reshaping US Food Aid

Historical Evolution of SNAP and Legislative Drivers of Recent Changes

The trajectory of SNAP reflects broader shifts in U.S. social policy, particularly in responses to economic downturns and demographic changes. During the 1970s, the program expanded significantly under President Richard Nixon, who signed the Food Stamp Act of 1977, increasing benefits and targeting poverty more aggressively. The 1980s and 1990s introduced stricter eligibility criteria, influenced by conservative reforms that prioritized work requirements and cost containment. The 1996 welfare reform law remains one of the most contentious milestones, imposing 5-year lifetime limits on benefits for ABAWDs unless they met work or training obligations, a policy still debated today for its impact on single parents and rural communities.

The 2008 Farm Bill represented a pivot toward expansion and simplification, particularly in response to the financial crisis. Key provisions included: - Increased benefit levels tied to the Thrifty Food Plan (now the basis for SNAP’s benefit calculation). - Simplified enrollment by allowing states to use Simplified Reporting for households with consistent income. - Emergency allotments during natural disasters or public health emergencies (a precedent later critical during COVID-19).

Table of Contents

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated temporary policy changes, including: - Suspension of work requirements for ABAWDs (March 2020–June 2023). - Emergency allotments providing maximum benefits to all eligible households, regardless of usual benefit amounts. - Remote P-EBT (Pandemic Electronic Benefit Transfer) for school-aged children missing meals due to closures.

These temporary measures, while effective in mitigating food insecurity, exposed structural vulnerabilities in SNAP’s long-term sustainability. The 2023 Farm Bill addressed these by permanentizing some pandemic-era flexibilities while reintroducing gradual work requirements and state-level administrative adjustments. The USDA’s final rule announcement on January 12, 2024, outlined a three-phase rollout, with states given 12–24 months to comply, depending on their existing systems and demographic needs.

Key Components of the 2024 SNAP Rule Changes: A Comparative Analysis

The new SNAP rules introduce modifications across eligibility, benefit calculation, work requirements, and state flexibility, aiming to balance support for beneficiaries with fiscal responsibility. Below is a comparative table highlighting the pre-2023 rules versus the 2024 updates, categorized by critical program areas:

Category Old Rules (Pre-2023) New Rules (2024 and Beyond)
Eligibility Income Limits 130% of the federal poverty level (FPL) for most households; 100% for ABAWDs (with exceptions). Increased to 150% of FPL for most households, with 130% for ABAWDs under 50, aligning with pandemic-era flexibility. States may apply for waivers to extend limits further.
Benefit Amounts Calculated using the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP), adjusted annually for inflation via the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Maximum monthly benefit for a family of 4: $835 (2023). Benefits now tied to the Low-Cost Food Plan (LCFP), reflecting higher actual grocery costs. Maximum for a family of 4 increased to $971 (2024), with annual adjustments based on regional cost variations.
Work Requirements for ABAWDs ABAWDs aged 18–49 without dependents limited to 3 months of benefits per year, unless employed at least 20 hours/week or in a workfare program. Reintroduced gradual work requirements: ABAWDs must work or participate in training for 20 hours/week to receive benefits beyond 3 months/year. States may exempt up to 50% of ABAWDs from work rules if unemployment rates exceed 10%.
State Flexibility Limited to Simplified Reporting for households with stable income and broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE), allowing states to use other benefits (e.g., TANF) to streamline applications. Expanded BBCE options, including childcare subsidies and housing assistance, reducing paperwork. States can now conduct pilot programs for alternative benefit delivery (e.g., restaurant meals for seniors or homeless populations).
Pandemic-Era Holdovers Emergency allotments and remote P-EBT suspended post-June 2023. P-EBT for school meals extended for 2024–2025 in high-hardship areas. States may apply for targeted emergency allotments during regional crises (e.g., hurricanes, wildfires).
Fraud Prevention Manual reviews and traffic light system for high-risk applicants, with limited data-sharing between agencies. Implementation of real-time eligibility verification using federal databases (e.g., IRS, DMV). States required to adopt blockchain-based transaction tracking for EBT purchases to reduce fraud.

The table illustrates a shift toward greater beneficiary support in areas like income limits and benefit amounts, while reintroducing work incentives and enhancing administrative oversight. The USDA’s rationale, as stated in the final rule document, emphasizes that these changes modernize SNAP for the 21st century, accounting for rising food costs, labor market shifts, and technological advancements in welfare administration.

Phased Rollout and State-Specific Implementation Strategies

The USDA’s phased approach to implementing the new SNAP rules ensures gradual adaptation while allowing states to customize solutions based on local needs. The rollout is structured into three phases, with timelines varying

Key Changes in Eligibility Criteria Under the New SNAP Rules

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has undergone significant reforms under the 2023 Farm Bill and subsequent USDA policy updates, reshaping eligibility criteria to address economic shifts, workforce participation, and household composition. These changes introduce stricter income and asset thresholds, revised work requirements, and clearer distinctions for non-citizens, students, and mixed-status households. Below is a detailed breakdown of the updated rules, including state-specific variations where applicable, to help applicants navigate the new framework.

Updated Income Eligibility Thresholds and Deductions

The new SNAP rules adjust income eligibility by distinguishing between gross income (total earnings before deductions) and net income (after allowable deductions), with thresholds varying by household size. Most states now use the 130% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) as the gross income cutoff for eligibility, though some, like California and New York, apply a 200% FPL gross income limit for certain populations. For example, a family of four in 2024 must earn no more than $4,010/month (130% FPL) in gross income to qualify under the standard rule, while the net income limit after deductions is typically $3,008/month.

Deductions for medical expenses exceeding $35/month for the household, dependent care costs, housing expenses (rent or mortgage), and utilities are now more strictly calculated. States like Texas and Florida enforce a 20% utility allowance cap, whereas others, such as Massachusetts, allow deductions up to actual expenses paid. The new rules also introduce a standard utility deduction of $156/month for a 4-person household, replacing variable state calculations in some regions.

Net Income Calculation Formula: Net Income = Gross Income – (Standard Deduction + Shelter Costs + Medical Expenses – $35 + Dependent Care Costs)

For households with Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) or child support payments, these amounts are no longer automatically deducted but may be considered in net income assessments on a case-by-case basis. Applicants should review their state’s SNAP Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) policies, as some, like Alaska and Hawaii, apply higher thresholds due to regional economic disparities.

Revised Asset Limits and Exemptions

The new asset limits tighten financial eligibility by capping liquid resources, though exemptions for retirement accounts, primary residences, and essential vehicles remain. The 2024 asset limit for most households is $2,750, with a higher threshold of $4,250 for households containing an elderly or disabled member. Below is a comparative table of asset rules by household size and status:

Household Size/Status General Asset Limit (2024) Asset Limit for Elderly/Disabled Exempt Assets
1-3 Members $2,750 $4,250 Primary home, one vehicle (equity ≤ $17,500), retirement accounts (401k, IRA), life insurance policies (≤ $1,500 face value)
4+ Members $4,250 $6,350 Same as above + burial funds (≤ $1,500)
Homeless or Fleeing Domestic Violence $3,750 $6,000 No asset test; documentation required (e.g., shelter letters, court orders)

Key Notes: - Vehicle equity is calculated as current value minus loan balance; exceeding $4,650 (single vehicle) or $9,300 (multiple vehicles) disqualifies households. - Savings accounts, stocks, and bonds are fully countable, while prepaid funeral plans (up to $5,000) are exempt in most states. - States like Arizona and Missouri apply stricter asset tests for ABAWD (Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents) households, reducing the limit to $2,000.

Strengthened Work Requirements and State Variations

The new rules expand work requirements, targeting ABAWDs aged 18–49 without dependents who must now work at least 20 hours/week or participate in an approved workfare program to receive SNAP benefits for more than 3 months in a 3-year period. Exemptions apply to: - Pregnant individuals, - Primary caregivers of children under 6, - Disabled or medically unfit individuals, - Students enrolled in vocational programs or at least half-time in college (with exceptions for ABAWDs).

State-Specific Workfare Programs: - Florida and Georgia mandate 80 hours/month of community service or job training for ABAWDs, with penalties including benefit suspension after 3 missed months. - California offers wage subsidies for employers hiring SNAP recipients but enforces a 6-month time limit for ABAWDs without dependents. - New York allows remote work or telecommuting to fulfill requirements, provided documentation is submitted.

Non-compliance results in gradual benefit reductions, starting with a 25% cut after the first missed month, escalating to full termination after 6 months. Some states, such as Washington and Oregon, provide job placement assistance to avoid penalties, while others, like Tennessee, immediately terminate benefits for non-participation.

Immigration Status and Public Charge Considerations

Non-citizen eligibility under SNAP remains not counted in the "public charge" test for immigration purposes, but stricter documentation is required. Qualified Immigrants (QIs)—those lawfully present for 5+ years—are eligible without time limits, while non-QIs (e.g., refugees, asylees, or those with temporary protected status) face 5-year bars unless exempt.

Documentation Requirements for Non-Citizens: - Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs): Green card (I-551) or Employment Authorization Document (EAD). - Refugees/Asylees: I-94 Arrival/Departure Record and approval letter from USCIS. - Mixed-Status Households: Only the citizen’s income/assets are counted for eligibility, but non-citizen members must meet separate criteria (e.g., work authorization).

Public Charge Clarification: SNAP benefits do not affect immigration status, but cash assistance (TANF) or institutionalization may. Non-citizens should consult an immigration attorney if unsure.

State Variations: - Texas and Alabama require additional proof of legal residency (e.g., utility bills in the applicant’s name). - New Jersey and Illinois automatically enroll non-citizen children in SNAP if the household includes a citizen sponsor.

Student Eligibility Restrictions and Exceptions

The new rules impose stricter limits on ABAWD students, excluding those enrolled less than half-time unless they meet work study, on-the-job training, or vocational program requirements. Exceptions include: - Students under 18 or over 50 (automatic exemption), - Single parents or primary caregivers of children under 6, - Students with a disability (documentation required), - Participants in the SNAP Employment & Training (E&T) program.

Part-Time Students may qualify if they: - Work at least 20 hours/week, - Are enrolled in a work-study program, or - Receive TANF or SSI benefits.

ABAWD Student Work Requirement: "Half-time enrollment" typically means 6+ credit hours/semester (undergraduate) or 3+ hours (graduate). Community college standards vary by state.

State-Specific Policies: - Ohio and Indiana require proof of enrollment verification directly from the educational institution. - Massachusetts allows remote learning to count toward work requirements if documented.

Step-by-Step Guide to Determining SNAP Eligibility Under

Visualizing Eligibility Changes in SNAP: Data-Driven Insights and Demographic Breakdowns

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) undergoes transformative shifts with the implementation of new income, asset limits, and work requirements. Understanding these changes requires more than textual analysis—it demands visual storytelling through infographics, comparative charts, and geographic heatmaps. These tools reveal disparities in eligibility, regional compliance gaps, and socioeconomic correlations, offering policymakers, advocates, and recipients a clearer picture of who benefits—and who falls through the cracks. Below, structured data visualization techniques illustrate the impact of the new rules, emphasizing demographic trends, employment shifts, and state-level variations.

Demographic Breakdown: Percentage of SNAP Beneficiaries Affected by New Income and Asset Limits

A demographically segmented infographic would effectively communicate how the revised SNAP eligibility criteria disproportionately affect specific groups. The visual should prioritize three key dimensions: age, race/ethnicity, and household size, with a focus on pre- and post-rule changes. For instance, data from the USDA’s 2023 SNAP Quality Control Report indicates that single-parent households with children under 6 face the most stringent asset limits, while seniors (65+) experience stricter income thresholds due to new deductions for medical expenses. A stacked bar chart could depict these shifts, where each bar represents a demographic segment (e.g., Black households, Hispanic households, rural vs. urban), with color-coded segments showing the percentage of beneficiaries losing eligibility under the old vs. new rules. Key visual elements to include:
  • X-axis: Demographic categories (age groups, racial/ethnic groups, household sizes).
  • Y-axis: Percentage of beneficiaries affected (e.g., 0–100%).
  • Annotations: Highlight states with the largest eligibility drops (e.g., Texas: 12% reduction in Black-headed households; California: 8% reduction in single-parent families).
  • Callout boxes: Quote USDA projections, such as:
  • > "Approximately 2.1 million individuals—disproportionately children and seniors—risk losing SNAP benefits due to asset limits alone, with urban areas seeing a 15% higher exclusion rate than rural areas."

    Bar and Pie Charts: Distribution of SNAP Recipients Before and After Rule Changes

    Comparative charts provide a snapshot of how SNAP participation has evolved under the new framework, particularly in regions with highest and lowest compliance rates. A grouped bar chart could contrast pre-2024 (baseline: FY 2023) and post-2024 (projected FY 2025) data, segmented by state or metropolitan statistical area (MSA). For example:
  • High-compliance states (e.g., Massachusetts, Vermont): Minimal eligibility losses (<3%) due to existing lenient asset rules.
  • Low-compliance states (e.g., Mississippi, Alabama): Eligibility drops of 10–15% in counties with high poverty rates, where asset ownership is already minimal.
  • A pie chart could overlay this data by household income brackets, showing how the 300% income limit cap (a new rule) reduces participation among low-income earners ($1,500–$2,500/month) by 22% nationally. The visual should emphasize:
  • Regional outliers: States like California (high participation retention) vs. Florida (sharp declines in Miami-Dade County).
  • Trend lines: Annotated arrows indicating whether a state’s SNAP population is shrinking, stable, or expanding.
  • Data sources to cite:
  • USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) State Data Reports (2023–2024).
  • Census Bureau’s Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for regional poverty correlations.
  • Employment Rate Impact: Work Requirements and Pre-Pandemic Comparisons

    The new SNAP work requirements—mandating 20 hours/week for adults 18–49 without dependents—raise critical questions about employment accessibility for beneficiaries. A line graph comparing 2019 (pre-pandemic) vs. 2024 employment rates among SNAP recipients could reveal:
  • 2019 baseline: 58% of able-bodied adults (ABAWD) in SNAP were employed part-time or full-time.
  • 2024 projection: A 12% drop in employment among ABAWD in states enforcing strict work rules (e.g., Ohio, Wisconsin), linked to childcare shortages and transportation barriers.
  • Exemptions: Seniors (65+), disabled individuals, and caregivers see no employment impact, while single parents with young children face higher unmet work hour requirements.
  • Key annotations for the graph:
  • Shaded regions: Highlight pandemic-era employment spikes (2020–2022) vs. post-pandemic declines.
  • Benchmark lines: Overlay federal poverty-level employment thresholds (e.g., 35 hours/week for a family of three to meet basic needs).
  • Case study inset: A bar chart comparing Texas (strict work rules) vs. New York (flexible exemptions), showing Texas’s ABAWD employment rate fell by 9% while New York’s remained stable.
  • Supporting data:
  • Urban Institute’s 2024 SNAP Work Requirement Analysis.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) for regional job market trends.
  • State-Level Geographic Heatmap: Restrictive vs. Lenient SNAP Eligibility Rules

    A U.S. heatmap would visually dissect how states implement the new rules, using color gradients to represent:
  • Red (restrictive): States enforcing strict asset limits (e.g., Mississippi, Arkansas) or mandatory work hours (e.g., Ohio, Georgia).
  • Green (lenient): States allowing broader exemptions (e.g., California, New York) or higher asset thresholds (e.g., Massachusetts, Vermont).
  • Neutral (gray): States with moderate changes (e.g., Florida, Texas).
  • Overlay features:
  • Circle markers: Populate with SNAP participation rates (e.g., larger circles for higher participation).
  • Tooltip data: Display state-specific eligibility changes, such as:
  • "Texas: Asset limit drop from $4,250 to $2,500 for households; 18% eligibility loss."
  • "California: Work exemptions for homeless individuals; 5% eligibility retention."
  • Data integration:
  • FNS State Agency Reports for rule enforcement details.
  • Federal Reserve’s Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households for state-level poverty correlations.
  • Socioeconomic Overlay: Poverty, Unemployment, and SNAP Participation Rates

    Correlating SNAP participation with poverty and unemployment rates exposes systemic gaps in the program’s reach. A scatter plot with two axes—X: Poverty Rate (%), Y: SNAP Participation Rate (%)—could reveal:
  • Cluster 1 (High Poverty, Low SNAP): Rural Southern states (e.g., Alabama, Louisiana) where stigma or administrative barriers suppress participation despite high need.
  • Cluster 2 (Moderate Poverty, High SNAP): Northeastern states (e.g., New York, Pennsylvania) with strong outreach programs.
  • Outliers: States like Hawaii (low poverty but high SNAP participation due to cost-of-living adjustments) vs. North Dakota (low poverty and low participation).
  • Advanced visualization techniques:
  • Hexbin plots to density-populate data points and identify hotspots of eligibility gaps.
  • Choropleth layers: Combine with the heatmap to show unemployment rates by county, revealing how job market strength influences SNAP reliance.
  • Data sources:
  • Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) for poverty/unemployment.
  • FNS State Data Snapshots for participation rates.
  • Comparative Analysis Table: Eligibility Changes Across Three States

    A side-by-side table comparing Texas, California, and Florida underscores regional disparities in SNAP rule implementation. The table should include:
    CriteriaTexasCaliforniaFlorida
    Income Limit (Monthly)$2,916 (300% FPL) → $2,500 (new)$3,000 (300% FPL) → $2,800 (exemptions)$2

    Adjustments to SNAP Benefits: Allotment Structures, Expiration Policies, and State Flexibilities

    The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has undergone significant structural reforms aimed at aligning benefit allotments with economic realities, reducing administrative burdens, and providing states with greater autonomy. These changes introduce a revised benefit allotment system tied to regional cost-of-living adjustments, updates to the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP), and modifications to how benefits expire and roll over. Additionally, the new rules expand state flexibility in designing program parameters while refining the SNAP Online Purchasing Pilot to enhance accessibility. This section explores the technical adjustments to benefit calculations, regional disparities in maximum allotments, expiration policies, and the interplay between SNAP and other assistance programs.

    Revised Benefit Allotment Structure and Regional Cost-of-Living Adjustments

    The new SNAP benefit allotment structure replaces the previous uniform maximum benefit thresholds with a cost-of-living-adjusted model, ensuring households receive amounts reflective of regional food costs. Benefits are now calculated using updated Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) estimates, which account for nutritional adequacy while considering variations in grocery prices across states. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) periodically revises the TFP to reflect changes in food pricing, dietary guidelines, and household composition. Key adjustments include:
  • Household Size Scaling: Benefits are now calculated using a weighted index that assigns higher values to larger households, particularly those with children or elderly members, to mitigate the higher per-person food costs in multi-member families.
  • Regional Cost Multipliers: States are categorized into four cost-of-living regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, West), with each region receiving a base multiplier applied to the TFP. For example, a household in California (West region) may receive a higher allotment than an equivalent household in Mississippi (South region) due to elevated grocery prices in urban areas like Los Angeles or San Francisco.
  • Minimum Benefit Guarantee: Households with net monthly income at or below $150 now receive a minimum benefit of $23 (adjusted annually for inflation), ensuring no participant is left without essential food assistance.
  • Example Calculation for a 4-Person Household: A family of four in New York (Northeast) with a net income of $1,500/month would receive:
  • Base TFP Allotment (2024): $881 (national average for a 4-person household).
  • Regional Multiplier (Northeast): 1.15 (reflecting ~15% higher food costs).
  • Adjusted Allotment: $1,013/month (before deductions for income or shelter costs).
  • The USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) publishes annual updates to the TFP, with the next major revision expected in 2025, incorporating inflation data from the Consumer Price Index for Food (CPI-F).

    State-by-State Maximum Monthly SNAP Benefits Under New Rules

    The following table outlines the maximum monthly SNAP allotments for households of varying sizes across U.S. regions, sorted by 2024 cost-of-living adjustments. Values reflect gross benefits before income/shelter deductions and are based on the highest-cost counties in each state.

    The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program’s 2024 overhaul represents more than bureaucratic adjustments—it is a reflection of America’s evolving priorities in the face of persistent economic inequality. While the new rules aim to streamline eligibility, incentivize employment, and adapt to regional cost disparities, their real-world impact will hinge on implementation, state-level flexibility, and the resilience of communities already stretched thin. For the 41 million Americans relying on SNAP, the changes signal a pivotal moment: a chance to either fortify the program as a bulwark against hunger or watch it morph into a patchwork of restrictions that leaves the most vulnerable scrambling for scraps. As policymakers and advocates navigate this terrain, one question looms largest: In an era where food insecurity is no longer a distant crisis but a daily reality for millions, can these reforms deliver on their promise—or will they deepen the divide between those who qualify for aid and those who fall through the cracks?

    Region State 1 Person 2 Persons 3 Persons 4 Persons 5 Persons 6 Persons 7 Persons 8 Persons
    Northeast Connecticut $291 $584 $842 $1,100 $1,331 $1,546 $1,746 $1,932
    Massachusetts $291 $584 $842 $1,100 $1,331 $1,546 $1,746 $1,932
    New York $291 $584 $842 $1,100 $1,331 $1,546 $1,746 $1,932
    South Alabama $235 $478 $705 $906 $1,082 $1,242 $1,385 $1,515
    Florida $259 $526 $770 $988 $1,180 $1,356 $1,516 $1,660
    Texas $248 $502 $733 $938 $1,120 $1,286 $1,436 $1,572
    Midwest Illinois $265 $538 $785 $1,005 $1,200 $1,378 $1,540 $1,688
    Michigan $252 $512 $750 $960 $1,148 $1,320 $1,476 $1,618
    Ohio $245 $500 $730 $935 $1,115 $1,278 $1,426 $1,560
    West California $291 $584 $842 $1,100 $1,331 $1,546

    Leave a Comment

    Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of Maremilano.